Tuesday, March 10, 2026

Asexual Reproduction Not An Evolutionary Advantage In Ants Or In Any Other Animal

 


Live Science reports of a Japanese ant species called Temnothorax kinomurai that is able to reproduce asexually but it doesn’t produce workers or even male breeders.  It only produces queens like itself.  Most ant species do not reproduce asexually but require both a male and female to reproduce and what is most interesting is that the queen is able to determine both the gender and role of the offspring she produces.  The Live Science item stated:
 
 
 
Most ants live in regimented, closely related societies in which queens retain sperm cells from when they mated before founding the colony. They use these sperm cells selectively to either lay fertilized eggs that will become female workers or queens, or unfertilized eggs that develop as short-lived males. [1]
 
 
 
Evolutionists have pointed to asexual reproduction as evidence for evolution and have even claimed it to be a superior advantage to heterosexual reproduction.  The Live Science item argues:
 
 
 
Asexual reproduction can allow an organism to maximize its own genetic contributions to the next generation by producing genetically identical daughters, and asexual species can often outcompete their sexual counterparts because they don't have to invest energy and resources into finding mates and producing males. [2]
 
 
 
It certainly might appear that way at first as offspring might be reproduced on a more rapid scale in the case of asexual reproduction, but is it really an advantage in the long run?  In the case of the ants, the Live Science item does admit a disadvantage to asexual reproduction:
 
 
 
sexual reproduction produces genetically diverse workers, which can be beneficial for an ant colony when it comes to pathogen defense and division of labor. [3]
 
 
 
In other words, if all the temnothorax kinomurai is able to produce are queens like itself, then that does not bode well for a functioning ant colony because the establishment and maintenance of an ant colony depends on queen’s ability to produce offspring suited for different roles and as the Live Science item does rightfully point out, the disadvantage that the creatures that reproduce asexually face is a lack of genetic diversity which means a limited ability to adapt to changing environmental and ecological circumstances and susceptibility to epidemics that sexual reproducers may be less susceptible due to their ability to produce offspring with a greater genetic diversity and to make matters worse for asexual reproducers, if there is a loss of or corruption of the genetic information being copied that is inherited by the offspring, those same errors and lack of information will only continue to get passed down to each successive generation and with the risk of further information lost or corrupted which, in the long run, could be detrimental to the survival of the species which is why God, in His infinite wisdom, did not make very many asexual producers within the animal kingdom, having known ahead of time that His creations would need with in them the genetic and hereditary potential to produce genetically and hereditarily diverse offspring in order to enable the animals to be able to live and thrive in various different environments and ecosystems, and to be kept preserved from various infirmities, diseases, and pestilences as the vast variety of life that we see in the world and the variation that we see even within forms of life distinct from one another are only possible through the production of offspring through the mating of males and females within each given form of life rather than asexual producers.
 
 
 
End notes:
 
 
 
1.  Chris Simms, “Every ant is a queen in this parasitic species — and they reproduce by cloning themselves and hijacking other ant colonies,” Live Science, March 3, 2026
https://www.livescience.com/animals/insects/every-ant-is-a-queen-in-this-parasitic-species-and-they-reproduce-by-cloning-themselves-and-hijacking-other-ant-colonies?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=pushly&utm_campaign=Animals
 
2.  Ibid.
 
3.  Ibid.



For those who like my work and wish to make a financial donation, you can donate to Contender’s Edge at:

 

Ko-fi
 
Or consider becoming a paid subscriber at the Contender’s Edge Substack
https://contendersedge.substack.com/

No comments:

Post a Comment